“Replication is held as the gold standard for ensuring the reliability of published scientific literature.” (p. 600, Frank & Saxe, 2012)
I taught a lab course in I/O psychology to undergraduate psychology students at Nanyang Technological University. I designed the course around conducting a replication of a recently published I/O-related research in top-tier psychology journals. Following Brandt et al.’s (2014) replication recipe, students completed pre-registration and post-completion reports on the Open Science Framework. My goal in teaching this course was to help students learn the basic tools of psychological science, while at the same time ensuring the reliability of the published literature and helping students understand the value of open, ethical science.
Please click on the links below for the registered reports.
Replication of Bauer & Spector (2015, Human Behavior) by Ice Asher Chew, Chan Ying Ying, Nicholas Lee, and Carlson Chen Jia Seng
Replication of Foster & Diab, Study 1 (2017, Journal of Applied Social Psycholgy) by Sylvia Chen, Kelvin Jang, Deon Yeo, Ho Yan Liang, & Christopher Gwee
Replication of Foster & Diab, Study 2 (2017, Journal of Applied Social Psycholgy) by Lee Ng Lin, Sim Wei Yang, Nicklaus Koh, & Ng Xue Qi
Replication of Hershcovis & Bhatnagar (2017, Journal of Applied Psychology) by Lee Pei Ying, Preethee Jayasri, Chua Siyun, Lim Teck Kin, & Kam Yit Fong
Replication of Motro & Ellis (2017, Journal of Applied Psychology) by Wong Jiahui Charmaine, Syafiqah Binte Samsudin, & Nataniel Wong
Replication of Pelt, van der Linden, & Born (2017, Human Performance) by Keichi Tan Chee Zhi, Tan Ren Kiat, Chua Jeng, Yap Yu Xiang, and Ong Baodong
Brandt, M. J., Ijzerman, H., Dijksterhuis, A., Farach, F. J., Geller, J., Giner-Sorolla, R., … & Veer, A. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217-224.
Frank, M. C., & Saxe, R. (2012). Teaching replication. Psychological Science, 7, 600-604.